Presentation of the Maricopa County election audit
WHAT: Members of the Maricopa County election audit team will present their findings to the Senate President and Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. This a presentation only and will not include public comment or questions.
WHO: Senate President Karen Fann
Judiciary Chair Senator Warren Petersen
Doug Logan, Cyber Ninjas CEO
Ben Cotton, CyFIR Founder
Ken Bennett, Senate Audit Liaison
Randy Pullen, Senate Audit Spokesperson
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai
WHEN: Friday, September 24, 1 p.m. Arizona time, 4 p.m. EDT
WHERE: State Senate Chambers
###
For more information, contact:
Mike Philipsen, Director of Communications
Arizona Senate Republican Caucus
Office: (602) 926-3972 Cell: (602) 904-2070 mphilipsen@azleg.gov www.azsenaterepublicans.com
Clearly Election Fraud occurred. . . Instead of encouraging audits to allow transparency, many politicians and journalists go to great lengths to attempt to avoid this. Every election, in all 50 states, should be fully audited to confirm accuracy.
Now we are discovering that highly unusual anomalies in Pima County exist, as a result of a review of statistical data, that many just want to ignore. Even districts with record (statistically impossible in comparison to historic figures) turnout, are considered normal and acceptable. "Nothing to see here - Move On!".
At what point do we recognize what happened in the November 2020 Election and take appropriate action to hold those responsible accountable?
Additionally, a thorough review of the Arizona mail…
Decertify the 2020 election. Don’t let the discrepancies of over 39K ballots go unchecked!! Were watching and waiting for republican’s to stand up to the deceitfulness of democrats. Please step up to the plate and do what’s right!
This was of great value to all Americans. Thank you for the courage to present this information to the public.
Thank you for your diligence in pursuing this matter. It is unfortunate that the county wasn't more cooperative because likely a number of these findings do have a valid explanation and attention could have been focused elsewhere. For those findings that do not have a good explanation however what are the next steps?
We are watching, please don't let this go unanswered